5.5     Personnel appointment and evaluation

The institution publishes and implements policies regarding the appointment, employment, and regular evaluation of non-faculty personnel.

 

Non-Compliance

 

Policies for employment and appointment are comprehensive and included.  Hiring requisitions are handled through an online recruitment system. The Cornerstone system requires review and approval procedures consistent with the institution’s policies.

 

The policies and practices for annual evaluations for executive and senior leadership are clearly presented.

 

The implementation of annual evaluation policies for unclassified staff is unclear. The institution provided an example of annual evaluations completed in 2015 and 2016. The institution indicated that the Cornerstone talent management system was implemented in 2017 and examples of evaluations for executive and senior leadership were presented in this format. There is no documentation to support the regular evaluation of unclassified staff from 2017 to the present.

iNSTITUTION’S rESPONSE 

Beginning in AY2017-2018, the Human Resources department announced that uniform performance evaluations would be implemented University-wide through the Cornerstone employee evaluation platform. The University recognized the need to centralize, coordinate, and track the completion of performance evaluations for employees and deliberately chose to invest in a comprehensive platform to meet the unique evaluation needs of all unclassified employees. Some units suspended unclassified evaluations in anticipation of the implementation of the University-wide system.  Executive, Administrator and faculty evaluations were implemented the following year, but unclassified evaluations are still being implemented. 

Many units across campus did in fact carry out evaluation of unclassified employees during the period 2017-2019.  The following are samples of area-specific annual unclassified performance evaluations that occurred across the University during that period.

Admissions

Example #

AY 2018-2019

1

Evaluation

2

Evaluation

3

Evaluation

4

Evaluation

5

Evaluation

6

Evaluation

7

Evaluation

8

Evaluation

9

Evaluation

10

Evaluation

11

Evaluation

12

Evaluation

13

Evaluation

14

Evaluation

 

Athletics

 

Example #

AY 2016-2017

AY2017-2018

AY 2018-2019

1

Evaluation

Evaluation

Evaluation

2

Evaluation

Evaluation

Evaluation

 

Development Office

 

Example #

FY2018

FY2019

1

Evaluation

Evaluation

2

Evaluation

Evaluation

3

Evaluation

Evaluation

4

Evaluation

Evaluation

5

Evaluation

Evaluation

6

Evaluation

Evaluation

7

Evaluation

Evaluation

8

Evaluation

Evaluation

9

Evaluation

 

10

Evaluation

 

11

Evaluation

 

 

Graduate School

Example #

AY2017-2018

1

Evaluation

2

Evaluation

3

Evaluation

4

Evaluation

5

Evaluation

6

Evaluation

7

Evaluation

8

Evaluation

9

Evaluation

 

Nursing

Example #

FY2017

FY2018

1

Evaluation

Evaluation

2

Evaluation

Evaluation

3

Evaluation

Evaluation

4

Evaluation

Evaluation

5

Evaluation

-

 

 

While the process prior to 2017 was neither uniform nor coordinated, the samples provided above from a variety of units spanning the institution demonstrate that supervisors were evaluating unclassified employees. Supervisors of unclassified staff used area-specific performance evaluations to set employee expectations and evaluate the extent to which employees attained those expectations.

Since the initial adoption of the Cornerstone performance management platform by executives, administrators and faculty in 2017, the institution has been preparing to roll out the platform that integrates goal planning and performance evaluation “instruments” into one system available to supervisors and unclassified staff across the institution. In the course of implementing this institutional improvement, numerous activities have recently occurred or are in progress in preparation to launch the inaugural cycle of performance evaluations for 2019 and goal planning for 2020. These include:

·         Though not ready to be presented, a formal policy regarding performance appraisal requirements for unclassified, classified, and academic employees has been drafted and is under consideration.

·         Executive Staff and Senior Administrators have conducted evaluations using the Cornerstone platform for two full cycles for the 2017 and 2018 years (provided in Compliance Certification).  Faculty have been evaluated through one complete cycle on Cornerstone.

·         To foster buy-in by unclassified staff and their supervisors, the University hosted “town hall” meetings in Fall 2018 to introduce the unclassified staff evaluation process for the 2019 rating period. These gatherings focused on the planning (expectations) as the starting point of the integrated performance process discussions between supervisors and subordinates.

·         Interventions were implemented when feedback raised concerns regarding the new rating competencies that employees were unfamiliar with but would be expected to be rated against. Most supervisors had not set these as expectations for their subordinates. As a result, the University chose to delay the launch of the Cornerstone platform for unclassified staff. In an effort to prepare the campus community for assessment against the new competencies, a series of intensive performance management leadership training seminars was implemented for all supervisors who manage unclassified staff.

·         During Fall 2019, all unclassified employees underwent the planning process (establishing expectations for competencies, required knowledge, skills and abilities, essential functions, and setting goals) that will result in formal, uniform evaluations in Spring 2020:  Planning Example 1   Planning Example 2   Planning Example 3.

·         By the end of Fall 2019, the majority of supervisors had completed the training, thus setting the stage for implementation of the review process.

·         On January 13, 2020, the second cycle of performance reviews, including both planning and evaluation of unclassified employees, will launch with all reviews expected to be completed by mid-spring 2020.

 

Supporting Documents

·         Agenda for Leadership Training Seminars

·         Contents of Unclassified Staff Evaluation Town Hall Meetings

·         Planning Example 1 (redacted)

·         Planning Example 2 (redacted)

·         Planning Example 3 (redacted)

·         Schedule for Leadership Evaluation Training Sessions

·         Schedule of Unclassified Staff Evaluation Town Hall Meetings